Even if
you were born long after 1969, Woodstock and its cultural influences probably
affect you. Here are some key employment law cases that have roots in
Woodstock.
Long Hair, Mustaches, Beards, and Employer Grooming Standards: Woodstock didn’t create long hair, but it
highlighted the generational divide between young and older men over hair
length.
In Kelly v. Johnson (1976), a police officer challenged his employer’s
prohibition of beards, and requirements for short hair and side burns. The Supreme Court upheld this regulation, rejecting the
officer’s contention that the First Amendment gave him a right of
self-expression.
Sexualizing Women:
Woodstock didn’t create the sexual revolution, but it highlighted the libertine
norms of the then-younger generation.
Southwest Airlines— which began
operations in 1967— was a tiny carrier until they broke with tradition and
attired their flight attendants in hot pants. Their market research showed that
70% of Southwest passengers were men who traveled on business. Connecting the dots
of the male psyche, they reasoned that they could gain a marketing edge by capitalizing
on the appearance of their flight attendants. At this time, every airline hired
only women for flight attendants.
Along came
Gregory Wilson, arguing that Southwest’s policy of hiring only women was sex
discrimination. A Texas federal court agreed in Wilson v. Southwest Airlines
(1981). Southwest changed from hot pants to khakis and polo shirts, while other
airlines still dress flight attendants more formally.
Recreational Drugs: Woodstock
didn’t inaugurate illicit drug use but it served as a visible embrace of
psychoactive drugs.
Just 14 years after Woodstock, President Reagan issued wide-ranging
drug testing requirements for some federal employees—and also for certain
private industries. In a broadly-worded opinion, the Supreme Court upheld drug
testing in Railway Labor Executives Ass’n (a union) v. Von Raab (1989). Reagan
intended for private sector employers to follow the government’s lead—and clearly,
they did.
Now drug testing has expanded from urine to blood testing, and from
testing illicit drugs to testing illicit and licit drugs.
As Joann
Worley would say on Laugh In, “Sock it to me.” So I'll sock it to you with an emblematic photo of the irreverence that Woodstock inspired.
No comments:
Post a Comment