Thursday, November 10, 2016

President Trump to "Cut Red Tape": Will Nurses Pay for This?


The Obama administration issued a joint-employer doctrine that is likely to be thrown out by the incoming heads at the U.S. Department of Labor.
Bellevue Hospital was founded in 1736, long before “gig work,” a term that applies to work that is organized as one-off assignments.
Anetha Barfield, a certified nursing assistant, sued Bellevue for overtime. For years, she regularly performed work at the hospital, not as its employee, but as a contract worker who was regularly referred to Bellevue through several referral agencies.
She occasionally worked more than 40 hours per week, but her work was divided between among several agencies, all of whom required her to sign a contractor agreement that she could not work for more than 40 hours in each week. Thus, she worked 60 hours in some weeks but qualified for overtime because she was paid a per diem fee—a daily rate.
Essentially, this clever system took a regular nursing job with consistent work hours, inserted a labor contractor as a middleman each with its own overtime limits, with the net result that Barfield worked a series of “gigs” in many weeks that were essentially the sum total of the fragmentation of her employment at Bellevue.
The Obama Department of Labor rule treats Bellevue—the end-user of labor who controls her conditions of work— as a joint employer of these agencies. This, according to a court, it owed Barfield overtime for weeks where she worked more than 40 hours per week.

When Trump’s policy makers cut “costly red tape” at the “bureaucracy” known as the Department of Labor, will they keep the joint employer rule in place? You be the judge of that.

No comments: