I share a deeply disturbing case I read today, authored by
the California supreme court in 1854.
As was common before 1866 (post-Civil war civil rights laws),
slaves and free blacks could not give
testimony in court against white people.
In People v. Hall (1854), testimony from three Chinese immigrants
was used to convict George Hall of murder.
The legal issue was whether the state’s bar against testimony
from blacks applied to Chinese. The trial court reasoned that Chinese are not
black, so their testimony could not be barred.
But in a stunningly racist opinion—and there can be no other
way to put it— the state supreme court held that the words Indian, Negro, Black
and White are generic terms designating race. Thus, Chinese and all other people not white, were included in the prohibition
from being witnesses against whites.
The court said:
The anomalous spectacle of a distinct people (Chinese
immigrants), living in our community, recognizing no laws of this State except
through necessity, bringing with them their prejudices and national feuds, in
which they indulge in open violation of law; whose mendacity (untruthfulness) is
proverbial; a race of people whom nature has marked as inferior, and who are
incapable of progress or intellectual development beyond a certain point, as
their history has shown; differing in language, opinions, color, and physical
conformation; between whom and ourselves nature has placed an impassable
difference, is now presented, and for them is claimed, not only the right to
swear away the life of a citizen, but the further privilege of participating
with us in administering the affairs of our Government.
The bottom line is
that this court reasoned that all people of color are morally and
intellectually inferior to whites.
When our society
tolerates racism against one group, it doesn’t usually doesn’t stop there.
Here’s hoping you make your own connections
between this 1854 case and today!
No comments:
Post a Comment