“True the
Vote” was created in 2009, shortly after Pres. Obama’s election. It pushes the
false narrative that voter fraud is endemic and massive. Their website states: “Our
Republic flourishes when citizens are confident that their vote is free, fair,
and secure. Yet, according to a recent survey 81% of Americans believe that
election fraud is a very real problem. This growing concern jeopardizes our
entire system of government, eroding our trust in elected leaders and
undermining our confidence in the system by which they govern— beginning at the polls and rising up through
the highest offices in the land.”
Sounds like
a longer version of a Donald Trump tweet.
The real story
is told by Ben Cady & Tom Glazer, Voters Strike Back: Litigating Against
Modern Voter Intimidation, 39 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 173, 216-19
(2015).
True the
Vote (TTV) is a voter suppression group that harasses minority voters.
Here is an
excerpt of their research (quoting):
There are several recent
examples of confrontational voter challenges at polling places. During a 2011
special election, Empower Massachusetts, a ballot security group, reportedly
engaged in belligerent voter challenges targeted at Hispanics and people with
disabilities. According to one report, a local official said the challenges
were “unnecessary,” and another witness said that citizens came away from the
polling place shaken and in tears and that “[s]ome people left saying, ‘I'll never
vote again.”’ During the 2010 recall election in Wisconsin, voting “slowed to a
crawl” at Lawrence University in Appleton due to “disruptive” challenges made
by three elections observers, including one from TTV.
The 2012 election cycle
also saw a large number of offsite registration challenges that raised concerns
about intimidation. TTV and its local volunteers developed proprietary software
to compile challenge lists using “driver's license records, property records
and other databases.” Volunteers then used those lists to initiate registration
challenges with local election officials.
In Hamilton County, Ohio,
Tea Party groups challenged 2100 voter registrations, with some groups
particularly focusing their efforts on students.
Many of these challenges
were groundless; for example, Tea Party groups called into question hundreds of
student registrations for failure to specify dorm-room numbers, but election
officials roundly rejected these challenges.
Nevertheless, some voters
received challenge notices in the mail stating that they were required to
attend a court hearing to defend against the challenge. Many such hearings were
sparsely attended. Ohio's chief elections official, a Republican, criticized
the frivolous challenges and expressed concern that such efforts can “border on
voter intimidation.”
For more,
see https://socialchangenyu.com/volume-39-issue-2/voters-strike-back-litigating-against-modern-voter-intimidation/
No comments:
Post a Comment