Thursday, March 29, 2018

Women Leading #RedforEd— What Does It Mean?


Arizona teachers do not have a union that can legally bargain for a labor agreement. But they have a First Amendment right to speech and assembly. Organizing under the banner #RedForEd, thousands of angry teachers flooded the Arizona capitol yesterday demanding a 20% hike in pay and benefits.
The most interesting part of the movement is that is that women are predominantly its leaders, organizers, and protesters. That’s because 76% of teachers are women, according to Department of Education statistics. 
But what does this mean more generally?
For perspective, consider the women’s suffrage movement in the U.S.
Lucretia Mott and Elizabeth Cady Stanton organized the first women’s rights convention in the world: the Seneca Falls Convention in 1848. These women were also intensely committed to abolishing slavery. Women from several countries met in England in 1840 at the World Anti-Slavery Convention.
In time, their efforts bore fruit. On August 26, 1920 the Nineteenth Amendment became part of the U.S. Constitution. It states: “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.”
The last push for women’s voting rights took a radical turn. In 1916, Alice Paul formed the National Woman's Party (NWP). A subset of this group— the Silent Sentinels— were arrested in 1917 while picketing the White House. Some went on a hunger strike.
Today, a large segment of women are politically energized. They reject the emerging political culture of disrespect, vulgarity, sexual exploitation, legal protection of assault weapons— and they won’t stand anymore for their own marginalization. The West Virginia teachers strike succeeded against long odds. Arizona teachers—a group not ever perceived as radical— are threatening to walk out of classes until their demands are met. Oklahoma teachers are following a similar course.
If #RedForEd is successful, it might be as transformational as the suffrage movement a century ago.

No comments: