Tuesday, May 29, 2018

Reagan, Bush I Kept Immigrant Families Together. Trump Separates Children from Parents


In 1986, Congress passed a major immigration law that gave amnesty to about three million people who entered the U.S. unlawfully. But children were excluded. This gave rise to a problem known as “split families.” A dad or mom could legalize his or her presence; children could not. They faced deportation.
On October 7, 1987, a Republican senator, Sen. John Chafee (R-RI), tried to fix this. He offered an amendment to an unrelated bill that would give children excluded from the 1986 law a path to legalization. The Senate defeated the amendment by a 55-45 vote.
Enter President Reagan, who fixed the children part. On October 21, 1987 Reagan’s INS Commissioner, Alan C. Nelson, announced INS’ (now called ICE) “Family Fairness” executive action. It was not an executive order. All presidents have “plenary powers” over immigration, meaning they control the gate into and out of the U.S. This was a gate-keeping action.
The INS’ memo explained the “clear” Congressional intent in 1986 to exclude family members from the legalization program. Nevertheless, the INS said it would defer deportation for children living in a two-parent household with both parents legalizing, or living with a single parent who was legalizing
Interesting to note, that was similar to President Obama’s DACA program—DACA standing for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. It means that DACA recipients remain deportable, but the executive branch is essentially putting them at the back of the long deportation line, behind criminals and others.
President Bush also strengthened family unification started by President Reagan. His INS Commissioner Gene McNary, issued a memorandum, "Family Fairness: Guidelines for Voluntary Departure under for the Ineligible Spouses and Children of Legalized Aliens (Feb. 2, 1990)." 
That memo was in effect for 28 years until President Trump’s ICE recently embarked on a policy of family separation. Again, it’s allowable under a president’s plenary powers. But it is cruel.
PHOTO CREDIT: Downstream.com

No comments: