(Ponca Chief Standing Bear Addresses the U.S. District Court in Nebraska in 1879)
Two Latino festivals in
Iowa have been cancelled. Organizers fear a violent backlash from immigration
foes who broadly blame “illegals” for killing Mollie Tibbetts and others.
We can learn much from a trial in
1879 to remove the Ponca Indian tribe from Nebraska. First,
we will listen to an argument made by an “educated” lawyer— a U.S. Attorney,
G.M. Lambertson— who sought removal and relocation of the Poncas. I have reprinted a
brief passage from his law review article “explaining” why Indians did not
deserve U.S. citizenship. Second, we will hear
from Chief Standing Bear, who addressed the court through a female interpreter,
Susette ("Bright Eyes") La Flesche. Lastly,
we will hear from the judge.
G.M. Lambertson: Again, there is no overwhelming political necessity, as in
the case of the negroes, requiring us to
make citizens of the Indians. When we remember that our country is heavily invaded,
year by year, by the undesirable classes driven out of Europe because they are
a burden to the government of their birth that as many as seventy thousand
immigrants have landed on our shores in a single month, made up largely of
Chinese laborers, Irish paupers, and Russian Jews; that the ranks are being swelled
by adventurers of every land -the Communist of France, the Socialist of Germany,
the Nihilist of Russia, and the cutthroat murderers of Ireland--that all these
persons may become citizens within five years, and most of them voters under
State laws as soon as they have declared their intentions to become citizens -
we may well hesitate about welcoming the late "untutored savages"
into the ranks of citizenship.
Standing Bear rose, extending his hand toward the judge’s bench: “That hand is not the color of yours, but if I pierce it, I shall feel pain. If you pierce your hand, you also feel pain. The blood that will flow from mine will be the same color as yours. I am a man. God made us both.”
Judge Elmer Dundy issued a ruling that surprised many observers and caused comment across
the country. The judge found that "an Indian is a
person within the meaning of the law" and that Standing Bear was being
held illegally. He issued a “writ of habeas corpus” — in this case, an order to
release someone held illegally.
The judge said more: "That the
Indians possess the inherent right of expatriation as well as the more
fortunate white race, and have the inalienable right to ‘life, liberty and the
pursuit of happiness,’ so long as they obey the laws and do not trespass on
forbidden ground.”
…
Two years after the trial, Congress appropriated
money to compensate the Ponca for their losses, and allocated land for
individuals of the Ponca tribe similar to homesteading titles given to white
settlers. The hate directed at Latinos in Iowa appears to be a step back from
the progress made in Nebraska in the early 1880s.
For more, see http://nebraskastudies.org/1875-1899/the-trial-of-standing-bear/the-trial/ and G. M. Lambertson, Indian Citizenship, 20 Am. L. Rev. 183 (1886).
For more, see http://nebraskastudies.org/1875-1899/the-trial-of-standing-bear/the-trial/ and G. M. Lambertson, Indian Citizenship, 20 Am. L. Rev. 183 (1886).
No comments:
Post a Comment