President Trump has tweeted
this morning that Google news searches are possibly “illegal” because they are “RIGGED”
(caps in original tweet) so that almost all stories about him are “bad.”
This brief post is to
assure you that the president—and his advisors, who are looking into regulating
Google searches— have no chance of succeeding.
The case on point is Reno
v. American Civil Liberties Union (1997).
In 1996, Congress passed the
Communications Decency Act. They sought to regulate online pornography.
Specifically, the law sought to criminalize any party that “knowingly” sent
anyone under 18 years of age content that displayed “any comment, request,
suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts
or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community
standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs.”
Every federal judge who
ruled on the case found the law unconstitutional.
Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for a
9-0 Supreme Court that struck down the law. He said: “It
is true that we have repeatedly recognized the governmental interest in
protecting children from harmful materials. But that interest does not justify
an unnecessarily broad suppression of speech addressed to adults.”
That law addressed an understandable
interest in shielding minors from graphic sexual content online. And the law
was so completely overruled by federal judges that Congress could only claim to
have scored a small point for trying to make the internet safer for kids.
President Trump’s tweets this morning
are, of course, the stuff that only dictators propose.
Be that as it may, it’s worth some time in the upcoming confirmation hearings to get Judge Kavanaugh on record about whether Reno v. ACLU should be overturned to enable a president—for whom he professes expansive powers— to regulate online searches for political purposes.
Be that as it may, it’s worth some time in the upcoming confirmation hearings to get Judge Kavanaugh on record about whether Reno v. ACLU should be overturned to enable a president—for whom he professes expansive powers— to regulate online searches for political purposes.
No comments:
Post a Comment