Two years ago, Chancellor Phyllis Wise took a stand against a
Twitter-crazed academic whose tweets were more than polemical— they personally
degraded American Jewish students, connecting all of them with what he
described as a murderous regime.
The media often characterized his tweets as “political”
and “anti-Israel,” and they were that. But the media often missed the point
that his tweets also degraded students simply by connecting their faith to a
far-away war in Gaza and Israel. Salaita understood that Netanyahu was raised
and educated in the U.S. (he holds two degrees from MIT)—and he blindly accused
current American Jewish students of being indoctrinated to follow the current prime minister’s path. In Salaita’s awful words, these students were future IDF
(Israel Defense Force) “murderers.”
In the winter that preceded the Salaita affair, Chancellor
Wise was subjected to vicious tweets by UIUC students who compared her to
North Korea’s despot, Kim Jun Eun, because she ordered the campus to remain
open in the midst of a severe “polar vortex” event. She had no choice but to
make this decision. She did not order students or faculty to go to class—only that
the campus could not shut down and stop vital services.
In 2016, we learned that these campus Twitter-storms were
really the tip of a growing iceberg.
We— America, and the rest of the Internet-connected world— have
entered the age of personal degradation; vicious stereotyping; “debates” that
deeply insult war heroes, women, the disabled, Mexicans, Muslims … the list is
too long and familiar to recount; extreme and existential threats; intolerance; racial superiority; and so on.
Chancellor Wise was derided by some for clinging to what her
detractors said was an outdated and repressive code of civility.
I wonder how many of her critics realize in 2016— now that
they (we) have been verbally brutalized by a dangerous American autocrat and intolerant followers— that Chancellor
Wise was right about civility: If we cannot set a baseline for civil discourse, we cannot maintain
our democratic society.
This is not "PC"-- it is the tone and vocabulary of a democracy.
This is not "PC"-- it is the tone and vocabulary of a democracy.
Today, the
loudest, meanest, nastiest, outrageously deceitful, cutting voices drown out reason, facts,
analysis, ambiguity, introspection.
We lost much in 2016-- much more than an election.
No comments:
Post a Comment