The Chicago Tribune is running a
chart-article showing that admission of Illinois residents at the University of
Alabama is growing at a very rapid pace. As of 2107, 4.1% of Alabama students
come from Illinois.
The implication of the article is
that the University of Illinois is not doing enough to be competitive in keeping
students.
Here’s what the Chicago Tribune isn’t
telling its readers:
At UIUC, 74 percent of undergrads are
from Illinois. That’s the highest in-state percentage of any Big Ten school except Rutgers (NJ). Wisconsin's
in-state level is 57 percent, Michigan's is 51 percent and the Big Ten average
is 62 percent.
Here’s another important statistic
that the Chicago Tribune is not reporting.
The graduation rate at UIUC is 85%. The
graduation rate at the University of Alabama is 67%.
That’s a big difference.
Is it because UA students aren’t prepared for the rigors of college? Is that where students and parents believe a promising student can thrive?
Is it because non-residents are dropping out, perhaps for cultural or other reasons?
Here is another big difference: the student loan default rate at the University of Alabama is 5.7%; the default rate at UIUC is 1.7% (U.S. Department of Education statistics for most recent reporting, 2014).
How does Alabama explain to parents and students-- who maybe chose the school because it's cheaper than UIUC-- that their ungraduated students are saddled with student loan debt but have no degree to show for their Alabama tuition, housing and fees?
Come on, Trib. Sure, there are things
to criticize at UIUC. But your writers pretend that the alternatives to the
University of Illinois—and to the State of Illinois— are clearly superior.
If that’s true, why don’t you change
your name to the Birmingham Tribune and see how many papers you can sell with that
fancy title.
No comments:
Post a Comment