Monday, June 10, 2019

Alabama Abortion Law Compares Roe v. Wade to Holocaust, Other Atrocities


Photo Credit: Brandon Kelly "Follower of Jesus. Husband. Dad. Pastor. Writer" 
I’m developing a research paper titled, “The Unborn Citizen.” Instead of disputing new fetal heartbeat laws, I accept (for this paper) the premise that human life begins at conception, not birth. What are the legal ramifications for unlawful aliens who are pregnant in Alabama? One implication is that the pregnant woman cannot be deported because doing so would deport a U.S. citizen. There are other implications. 
For now, I pass along portions of The Alabama Human Life Protection Act (source is here, https://legiscan.com/AL/text/HB314/id/1980843)

The law is premised on earlier legislation enacted by Alabama voters. On November 6, 2018, electors approved by a majority vote a constitutional amendment. The Constitution of Alabama of 1901 now declares and affirms the “public policy of the state to recognize and support the sanctity of unborn life and the rights of unborn children.”
The Alabama Human Life Protection Act uses the Declaration of Independence as justification for the law:
In the United States Declaration of Independence, the principle of natural law that “all men are created equal” was articulated. The self-evident truth found in natural law, that all human beings are equal from creation, was at least one of the bases for the anti-slavery movement, the women’s suffrage movement, the Nuremberg war crimes trials, and the American civil rights movement. If those movements had not been able to appeal to the truth of universal human equality, they could not have been successful.
Next, the law states:
It is estimated that 6,000,000 Jewish people were murdered in German concentration camps during World War II; 3,000,000 people were executed by Joseph Stalin’s regime in Soviet gulags; 2,500,000 people were murdered during the Chinese “Great Leap Forward” in 1958; 1,500,000 to 3,000,000 people were murdered by the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia during the 1970s; and approximately 1,000,000 people were murdered during the Rwandan genocide in 1994. All of these are widely acknowledged to have been crimes against humanity. By comparison, more than 50 million babies have been aborted in the United States since the Roe decision in 1973, more than three times the number w who were killed in German death camps, Chinese purges, Stalin's gulags, Cambodian killing fields, and the Rwandan genocide combined.
The law defines the following:
Section 3(7) UNBORN CHILD, CHILD or PERSON. A human being, specifically including an unborn child in utero at any stage of development, regardless of viability.
Section 3(8) WOMAN. A female human being, whether or not she has reached the age of majority.
For my analysis, what I find interesting is that there is no alienage restriction of who is an unborn person. This means that the unborn child of an “illegal alien” has full constitutional rights under Alabama law.
For now, I welcome comments of all types, pro and con, regarding this law—and I am especially interested in what readers see as implications if one assumes, as I do here, that Alabama has the constitutional power to say that life begins at conception. In other words, what does it mean—apart from criminalizing abortion— to say that a fetus is a person with full constitutional rights who enjoy the equal protection of the laws? 


No comments: