A growing
number of employers use artificial intelligence to screen candidates in the
hiring process. Gecko, Mya, AutoView and HireVue offer AI-powered interview platforms.
Under a law
passed by the Illinois General Assembly, Illinois employers using artificial
intelligence platforms during their hiring and recruitment processes would have
to seek the consent of job applicants.
What do interview-bots
do? They evaluate applicants’ facial expressions, word choices, body language,
vocal tones, and dozens of other personal
characteristics.
Data collected through this process is translated into
a score that the employer can use to determine whether a job candidate is a
good match for the organization. (I’ll get back to the red text in a few
seconds.)
Hundreds
of employers already use these platforms. They say it’s efficient and cuts
hiring time.
A
Deloitte study says that video interviewing assisted by AI can reduce pre-hire
assessment questions from 200 to just 5 and raises the possibility of
one-interview hires.
To be
clear, Illinois is not banning AI interviews.
“Applicants
deserve to be as prepared as possible coming into the interview process,” bill
sponsor Sen. Iris Y. Martinez (D) said in a statement. “While artificial
intelligence can be a useful tool for companies to screen and hire employees,
they should not be able to use it without the applicant agreeing to do so.”
The new
law will require employers to disclose their use of AI analysis tools as part
of the job recruitment and evaluation process. Prior to any video job
interviews, employers would have to notify the job applicant in writing that AI
may be used to analyze the applicant’s facial expressions and fitness for duty;
provide applicants with an information sheet explaining how AI works; and
obtain written consent for the use of AI technology during the interview
process.
The
legislation also would place limits on employers’ ability to share and maintain
AI videos. H.B. 2557 specifically requires employers to destroy such videos
within 30 days of a completed hiring process.
What are these dozens of other personal characteristics? I don’t know. My concerns are that people
with disabilities (speech impairments) and accents will be filtered out on
grounds of fluency. Ditto applicants with wrinkles (older workers), people of
color, and unattractive people.
Down the
road, I also worry about who gets pinned with liability for biased hiring decisions.
Let’s say that ABC Corp. uses AI-bots, and this leads to hiring bias. Under
Title VII and related discrimination laws, employers are liable. Here, the
employer could plausibly shift the blame to the AI firm—not an employer, and
therefore, not liable.
No comments:
Post a Comment