Brutus Stabs Caesar
One thing
that Republicans and Democrats agreed on today—and also President Trump: One or
more of the people who are very close to him leaked sensitive information to
the whistleblower.
My heart
says Kellyanne Conway just because I cannot see how she and George Conway can
co-exist in a marriage with such bipolar views of the president. Is she a mole?
But she
is not my guess. It’s White House Counsel Pat Cippilone.
Sure, I
am wrong. But here is my reasoning.
For one,
his predecessor, Don McGahn, spent 30 hours being questioned by the Mueller
team. McGahn did this freely. No one talks for 30 hours if he is compelled. It
takes about 30 minutes to close down a deposition by asserting executive privilege
or the Fifth Amendment.
He would
have talked to Cippilone, who was taking over for him. I can’t imagine the
conversation was flattering to the president. I believe it would be more like “help
the president enact his agenda but do not allow people in the White House to
break the law.”
Next, it's fair to say that Trump has a losing streak with his lawyers: McGahn cooperated extensively with Mueller, and it turns out that Michael Cohen was not willing to take a bullet for Trump. Cippilone might make it a hat trick.
Next, it's fair to say that Trump has a losing streak with his lawyers: McGahn cooperated extensively with Mueller, and it turns out that Michael Cohen was not willing to take a bullet for Trump. Cippilone might make it a hat trick.
Then
there is Cippilone’s education— an undergraduate degree, and a law degree, from
the University of Chicago. I’m not suggesting every graduate of U of C is a
saint. What I’m saying is that Chicago’s educational environment is crushingly
challenging—you only excel there by having extraordinary discipline. I think
that’s a trait that could lead to leaking out of some sense of moral imperative.
Then,
there is the jealousy angle. It’s clear that the real White House lawyer is
Rudy Giuliani. And Rudy was both lawyer and envoy in the Ukrainian
machinations. That would have to grind Cippilone’s gears.
Then,
there is the federal appeals court judge that Cippilone clerked for: Danny Boggs.
Judge Boggs has an unusual managing style: He
constantly quizzes his clerks on history, literature, and classics. Now those
are interesting topics. Anyone who is being quizzed on the study of the Greco-Roman world would know a lot of history,
especially tragic emperors who are similar to Trump.
This would sensitize a
person to the perils of tyranny and abuse of power—not to mention glorious
backstabbing events—for example, Brutus’ stabbing of Caesar, a megalomaniac of epic proportions (Trumpian).
Finally, there is
the lawyer side to this. The public is really frustrated when lawyers represent
the worst miscreants in society—but that’s the job of a lawyer.
But legal
privilege between a lawyer and client ends when the client seeks to use a lawyer in the commission of a
crime.
So, if that is true,
Cippilone would be adhering to his duty as a lawyer—and also protecting his
huge investment in his University of Chicago law degree.
No comments:
Post a Comment