Wednesday, January 25, 2017

Toward a Biometric National ID?

Whether America gets there by fact or fancy, the surest way to secure voting against ID fraud is to use biometric data in a national registry. Technovelgy explains that “an iris scan also provides unique biometric data that is very difficult to duplicate and remains the same for a lifetime…. There are ways of encoding the iris scan biometric data in a way that it can be carried around securely in a 'barcode' format." See the picture (the technology converts your scan to a bar code but doesn't affect your eye).
Biometrics are already widely used (these include fingerprints, voice recognition, eye scans and other bio-markers). Examples include banking, university dorms, apartment buildings, workplaces, immigration fast lanes, personal computer security, convicts (probation) and prisoners (jails).
Jamaica uses finger scanning for voter registration.
For some readers, voter fraud might justify this type of national registration. But I disagree, and draw on Ken Sturlin’s law review study, “DNA Without Warrant: Decoding Privacy, Probable Cause and Personhood.” Sturlin concludes his detailed study by saying:

“When the state tinkers with human biology, it tinkers with privacy…. There is a matrix of biological and digital data that can all too easily be linked with a person, without a warrant or authentication….
Man's biological destiny encompasses the future of privacy and personhood. People are information containers with rights, data in being, and so society's expectations of privacy must grow alongside technological innovation and scientific discovery.”


I hope cooler heads prevail in thinking through the implications of dealing with “massive voter fraud.” We might be trading away personal freedoms and opening the gates to national monitoring of our personal movements once we “ID” ourselves. This much I assume: A technology to perfect against voter fraud, in the hands of government, will not stop at the voting booth. 

No comments: