(File Photo-- Not Current)
Are gun rights so paramount
that a law can prohibit an employer from banning weapons on its property?
Yes, according to GOP
lawmakers and gun rights groups.
They are promoting a sneaky law titled the
Business Liability Protection Act.
Yawn.
A better title, according to the
National Law Review, is “the Parking Lot Gun Bill.” This law went into effect
in June 2018 in West Virginia—and it’s proposed in other red states.
The law says that employers may not
prohibit any employee from possessing a legally-owned firearm under the
following conditions: (1) the firearm is lawfully possessed; (2) the firearm is
out of view; (3) the firearm is locked inside or locked to a motor vehicle in a
parking lot; and (4) the employee is lawfully allowed in the parking lot or
parking area.
Sure, it has a veneer of a reasonableness.
But whatever happened to a person’s
right to control his or her private property?
And if employers are restricted from
banning guns on their property, what’s next? (The NRA always has a next step.)
Guns in school parking lots? Or, back to private property, prohibiting employers from banning guns in a workplace building?
…
Blue states are fighting back. The
NRA instituted an insurance program called Carry Guard. This offers gun owners
liability protection if their weapon causes unlawful harm and results in a
lawsuit.
But there’s a rub: States have
exclusive authority to regulate insurance companies.
New York suspended Carry
Guard on grounds that it created liability protection for illegal conduct—for example,
a mass shooting.
New York also fined Carry Guard—an arm
of the NRA— $7 million.
Washington state has taken similar
action against Carry Guard.
…
I hope a West Virginia employer will
sue to challenge the Parking Lot Gun law. The lawsuit would be straightforward.
Under the 14th Amendment, all persons (and corporations are persons)
have a right to life, liberty, and property, and the state cannot deprive
anyone (including employers) of these rights without due process. Forcing a person to accept guns
anywhere on his or property is clear-cut taking of one’s property rights
without due process of law. In short, the law should be ruled unconstitutional.
No comments:
Post a Comment