Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Tucker Carlson’s Interview of Chief Justice Taney: Why Dred Scott (Declaring Blacks as Inferior) Was a Great Decision!


Welcome to our program tonight—unfiltered by the leftist mob that is trying to silence common sense and patriotism. Tonight, we welcome Chief Justice Roger Taney to the program. He wrote one of the Supreme Court’s most misunderstood decisions in 1857. A slave sued for his freedom in the great state of Missourah, seeking a ruling that would declare him a free man. Mr. Taney recognized that the United States government cannot take away property from white men.
Chief Justice Taney, welcome to the show. 
Much of your wisdom has been lost over the past 160 years but the time is right to reconsider your views.
What was your reasoning that Dred Scott could never be a U.S. citizen because he was black?
“In the opinion of the court, the legislation and histories of the times, and the language used in the Declaration of Independence, show, that neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves, nor their descendants, whether they had become free or not, were then acknowledged as a part of the people, nor intended to be included in the general words used in that memorable instrument.”
Wow! So, you believe in an “originalist” way to read the Constitution?
“They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit.”
I gotta tell you, Chief Justice Taney, Democrats, Jews, women, illegals, negroes, and homosexuals would foam at the mouth like rabid animals to hear you say such an obvious fact. Maybe President Trump’s Supreme Court can restore some common sense.
We need to wrap things up to go to commercials from our besieged sponsors. Leave us with a concluding thought about the negro race.
“They were at that time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of beings who had been subjugated by the dominant race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges but such as those who held the power and the Government might choose to grant them.”
(ProfLERoy expressly rejects every idea in this interview, which is published as a parody.)

No comments: