There have been at least three mass casualty
shootings in American workplaces in the past 24 hours.
Before we grow numb to this routine
carnage, let’s take another look at the text of the Second Amendment: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security
of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be
infringed.”
Read in text and also context, the amendment
was enacted to allow citizen soldiers to rise up against a tyrannical
government. If you don’t have or need a militia, the Second Amendment doesn’t
apply. That’s strict constructionism—the type of judicial analysis favored by
right-leaning groups such as the Federal Society.
The debates today focus on the type
of weapon and the mental health of the shooter. Neither argument has proved
effective. To the contrary, a new and ludicrous counter-argument has taken
root. We need more guns in all possible locations where a mass shooting can
occur.
A new approach should be founded on a
pillar of our Constitution. The Fifth Amendment provides that the U.S. government
cannot take “life, liberty, or property without due process of law.” The
Fourteenth Amendment says that same thing. It applies to states and their local
governments.
So, why not enact federal and laws
titled “The Gun-Free Private Workplace Act”? The law would make clear that the
Second Amendment could not be interpreted so broadly as to override a private property
owner’s right to regulate the workplace by prohibiting guns.
Courts have already established this
right, many times over, in cases where, for example, employees have been fired
for bringing guns to work or even the parking lot of a workplace.
No, the law would not magically end
gun violence.
It would, however, amount to a major
defeat of the NRA’s unbounded premise that everyone has a right to carry a gun
anywhere they wish.
Republicans would have to choose
between voting for property rights of business owners—a natural for Republicans—or
for gun rights—also a natural for Republicans. Make a choice.
Finally, it would create an opportunity
for some private employers to do more than make up a rule. They might start to
screen people coming into the workplace. Places such as Rite-Aid— the site of
today’s fatal shooting— would be challenged to screen everyone who comes in to a large workplace.
No comments:
Post a Comment