The law
said: “If two or more persons in any State or Territory
conspire or go in disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for
the purpose of depriving any person or class of persons of the equal protection
of the laws” they shall be liable.
The criminal
part of the law was ruled unconstitutional in 1875. The civil part of the law
met the same fate until 1972. It was revived but only in very narrow
circumstances.
The problem
that has bedeviled the law is its narrow text! Consider the white terror groups
at Charlottesville. They weren’t in disguise, though they were on a highway and
sought to deprive blacks and supporters of equal rights. A pending lawsuit
argues that’s enough to invoke the law.
Does the fact that the men in the photo (above) are not in disguise mean that the Ku Klux Klan doesn't apply?
Does the fact that the men in the photo (above) are not in disguise mean that the Ku Klux Klan doesn't apply?
My article, “Targeting
White Supremacy in the Workplace,” offers a broader theory to apply the law.
I argue that courts have overemphasized the literal text. They should examine what lawmakers intended in 1871. To make the point, I lift-up the voices of congressmen and witnesses, all of whom described specific acts of violence and mayhem directed at blacks and their white supporters. Focus on the intent. The words simply illustrate a means, at the time, to spread terror.
I argue that courts have overemphasized the literal text. They should examine what lawmakers intended in 1871. To make the point, I lift-up the voices of congressmen and witnesses, all of whom described specific acts of violence and mayhem directed at blacks and their white supporters. Focus on the intent. The words simply illustrate a means, at the time, to spread terror.
In a very recent decision by
the Iowa Supreme Court (Baldwin v. City of Estherville, 2018), Justice Appel said the
following.
"Missing the point:
incorrect statutory interpretation of the Ku Klux Klan Act. In any event, there
is reason to question the prevailing federal statutory interpretation. Congress
enacted 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in 1871 to fight the Ku Klux Klan. See generally
Michael H. LeRoy, Targeting White Supremacy in the Workplace, 29 Stan. L. &
Pol’y Rev. 107, 120–23 (2018) [hereinafter LeRoy] (describing the history
surrounding the enactment of the Act)….
Further, the Reconstruction
Era Congress was determined, at least in 1871, to address the horrific
intimidation, terror, and violence visited on African-Americans by white supremacists
who gained control of state and local governments in the states of the former
confederacy. See LeRoy, 29 Stan. L. & Pol’y Rev. at 121–23. We should never
forget that while the Civil War ended in 1865 for most Iowans, a bitter and
brutal battle continued against African-Americans in the former slave states."
No comments:
Post a Comment